DON’T REMOVE YOUR GHOST FOLLOWERS ON INSTAGRAM
There seems to be a new false believe that removing ghost followers will help your engagement on Instagram.
This practice requires you to use an app to see who hasn’t liked or commented on your photos. After you have that list, you’re supposed to block them which forces them off as a follower.
The problem with this practice is you’re only looking at one side of that account’s analytics. The other side you cannot see is if they have consumed your content.
In the screen shot for the post above …. there is absolutely NO WAY that any third party app will be able to tell you which one of your followers saw the post but look inactive.
Time and time again I have tested these third party apps and found them classifying my family members as ghost users when in fact I know they are looking at every post; they just choose to not engage.
Ty.Poodle
January 9, 2018Amazing article, Thank you so much for giving a different look on “Ghost Followers” I was about to remove them, Now that I have a new perspective I will let thigs be ?
MaggieLovesOrbit
January 9, 2018Glad to provide a different perspective =)
MaggieLovesOrbit
January 26, 2018So glad you found it useful!
Chad Torkelsen
March 13, 2018Hey Maggie!
Great article and I totally agree, one thing however that I would like to point out is, when I see a lot of people using the term “Ghost Follower” what they are actually referring to an inactive user. In this case, it can greatly benefit an account to remove all inactive users from their follower list because although the follower:like ratio may not have a massive impact on total reach, it can, for accounts who purchased or follow/unfollowed in the past filling their followers that are actually fake and/or unused accounts, in this situation I believe it a totally necessary thing to do. I’d love to hear what you think!
MaggieLovesOrbit
March 13, 2018Hello Chad – than you for reading the article. There’s a saying in business that it’s harder to find a new customer than to keep an existing one. I look at inactive followers as someone I’d like to re-engage with instead of removing. It’s a different perspective. The problem I have with those apps is that I have a few test accounts that constantly get grouped as “inactive” even though they view the content. Those apps report the data they know. But what they don’t know is if that follower is “viewing” your content. Typically on my posts I will have 20% engagement so that means 80% of those that saw it… are grouped into the “impresion” bucket. In a normal scenario I’d rather figure out how to engage with them then delete them. Now in the case of removing fake followers – I agree. They shouldn’t have purchased fake followers to begin with.
MaggieLovesOrbit
March 13, 2018Also to add – here’s an article I read this last weekend on Entrepreneur: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/306934 where they focus on Re-engagement as a tactic as well. It’s a good read – hope you like it.
Cate
April 7, 2019Like Chad said. There is a difference between inactive accounts (fake accounts) and ghost followers. I don’t think it would be wise to try and re-engage with these fake accounts and even if you did, there’s no one behind those accounts and we’d only be wasting our time.
In the article from Entrepreneur, they are referring to ghost followers. Real accounts from people who just haven’t engaged with you in a while. There is a difference. Though, I agree that re-engagement does help a lot and that these apps aren’t always the best indicators of fake accounts.
Maureen
September 12, 2019I like your fresh perspective on ghost followers. I recently went through and deleted all my “eggheads” – the ones that I knew were some sort of fake follower. I was going to do it for the rest of my fakes, but now I will probably leave them all alone.
Expertans.Com
March 17, 2020The truth is that they are ghost followers – which means that they aren’t humans and they are not going to engage.